If objective morality exists, then there is an objective moral lawgiver. All that God can do is create the circumstances in which a person can make free choices and then stand back and let them make the choices. Nevertheless, the precise content of those obligations, and the circumstances under which they would come into effect, remain unclear, as God has not publicly revealed them to us, so far.
However, if God chose neither of these options, then such an ascription would seem pointless, as it would have no factual basis. The problem of evil only applies to theistic religions; other religions that hold that there are more than one god do not have the same problem.
The answer is that parental obligations are purely natural, arising from the fact that parents are human animals who have procreated a child, and that procreation is a basic human good which fulfills our Short essay on the problem of evil potential, and which may be legitimately pursued as an end in itself.
Yet evil in the form of suffering exists. While God is perfectly good, it is a deep mistake to think that this entails that he is a kind of cosmic Boy Scout, and that the problem of evil is a question about whether he deserves all his merit badges.
There is only God. Also, labeling good and evil this way would force a new definition of the terms upon us. Natural evil is a just punishment because people destroyed the natural cycle. Rowling has no obligations to the characters in her stories, so too, God has no obligations towards us.
Logically speaking, that which is divine cannot know and experience Itself except in the presence of that which is not divine. The reason that we even have an experience of perceived evil is because for the soul to experience itself as any particular thing, the exact opposite of that thing must come into the space.
Dualists believe that there are to forces governing humanity the good-God and the evil-Satan.
Sometimes it seems as if our sufferings really are catastrophic, but when you realize that you are offered eternal life without any suffering after you die, the sufferings of this life are a lot less upsetting than they would be if this life was all we had.
Because god is all-knowing he would know how to how to stop the evil if it ever occurred or even how to create a universe were no evil could exist. In this battle it is the evil principle that gives rise to the immoral or sinful actions of an individual person.
This idea contradicts statements in the bible that talk about punishing the wicked and evil people going to hell and so for this reason many religious people do not agree with this idea. And just as it makes no sense to think of an author as being unjust to his characters, neither does it make sense to think of God as being unjust to his creatures.
We have Providence to thank for that.
Not to instance great things, the mere possibility of producing milk from grass, cheese from milk, and wool from skins — who formed and planned this? Humanity used their free will to disobey god and cause suffering amongst the world.
Given that we humans seem to be on a dead run away from God, trying to keep our autonomy by knowing as little about him as possible. Theists usually like to argue that God has morally-sufficient reasons for allowing some evil in the world, in order to for the character of humans through suffering and endurance.
We therefore need to look for a more general solution to the problem of evil than the Incarnation. Then a forest fire starts and the poor fawn suffocates to death in the smoke. That was why I preferred the Tamagotchi analogy to the storybook analogy, as the characters can ask their owner to feed them.
He pointed out that Satan was not the cause of all evil but is just the catalyst, the evil was already in Adam and Eve it was just Satan who started it off.
He has said that humans have a limited perspective full of irony and confusion. It is dealt with by thinking about and working to bring about the good that you want in its place.
He also though that someone in could not be evil themselves but they could do evil acts so evil is just the absence of goodness not as force in its self.
Many have tried to understand the evil of this world and make sense of it, but the doctrine of evil is one of the most debated areas of philosophy.
Religious Science, or Science of Mind, founded in by Ernest Holmes, teaches that there is only one Presence and Power and that that Power is good. Even modern day philosophers such as Peter Van Inwagen attempt to create a solution to the problem of evil.
Feser apparently overlooks the significance of this point.The Problem of Evil This Essay The Problem of Evil and other 64,+ term papers, college essay examples and free essays are available now on mint-body.com Autor: review • October 19, • Essay • 1, Words (5 Pages) • 1, Views.
Tamagotchi, J. K. Rowling and God: A Short Essay on the Problem of Evil Posted on July 3, by vjtorley Catholic philosopher (and former atheist) Edward Feser. In his essay, Mackie examines what he calls “so-called” solutions to the problem: evil being a necessary counterpart to good, the universe being better off with some evil, evil acting as a means to good, and evil being the result of human free will.
Natural evil is part of the consequences of moral evil that resulted from the fall of man in the Garden of Eden. We will write a custom essay sample on Short Reflection on the Problem of Evil.
Short Essay #1 Hamartiology: The Problem of Evil (Theodicy) The problem with evil is that it is hard to believe that in a world created by a God that is supposed to be an all loving all power full God then why would he allow evil to be in the world.
Continue for 8 more pages» • Join now to read essay The Problem of Evil and other term papers or research documents/5(1).Download