The belief is that Ford Motors behaved with greed; which prevented the corporation from making ethical and moral decisions with regard to taking on the responsibility to right the wrong.
Iacocca was cut off from reality in a way that had a significant impact on his judgment. This error made the Pinto prone to rear collisions, which on many occasions were fatal even at relatively low speed.
Is business bluffing ethical? Gioia refused to follow the scripts and instead applied his own schemas which according to him dictated that he follows professional ethics.
Iacocca did not receive, or did not listen, to advice given to him related to the greater group of people affected by the automobile manufacturer. Cases like the Ford Pinto accidents have hopefully opened the door for other production companies to be more caring about what they put on the market.
Based on the above definition, however, cost benefit analysis was a legitimate tool, but for financial decisions only.
Cengage Learning Australia Pty Ltd. Included within the levels, should include legal services or even more specific and Ethics Lawyer. Ford was accused of not accounting for benefit and harm in an ethical business decision, zero personal evaluation, and a very high influence of outside factors.
Ethical business decisions require consideration of two important factors, benefit and harm. Second, Iacocca and his engineers did know that the design specs for the Ford Pinto were problematic.
He could not act, because the schemas guiding the company could not allow him to make an independent decision. In particular, the case showcases the role that engineers play in carrying out their jobs. No matter which action Iacocca took, both Ford shareholders and the entire public of the United States would be affected.
Did Ford Motors and James Neal consider benefit and harm? It works by first defining the project and any alternatives; then identifying, measuring, and valuing the benefits and costs of each. Iacocca Executive Vice President made the decision to move on with the production of the Pinto because he felt the studies conducted under the supervision of Mr.
Suddenly, maximizing happiness via providing a cheap car seems like a ridiculous decision. In the Ford Pinto case, there are several course of action that Iacocca had at his disposal.
Schemas are knowledge structures, which govern the day to day events in an organized manner of thoughts. Instead, eight years of continued production went by, and countless lives were lost due to the unethical and reckless behavior of Ford Motors.
Like the characters in the Stanford experiment, Gioia who was a former ethics activist transforms and overlooks the numerous deaths caused by the Pinto and still could not act rationally. The action with the "best net effect on happiness is the right action to perform," according to the fundamental steps of utilitarian decision-making "Utilitarianism".
Ford has argued for over three decades that The Ford Motor Company is not at fault, but rather the other motorists who happened to rear end the Pinto drivers.
Many also accuse Ford of being fully aware of the faults with the Pinto and selling it to the public anyway. The Ford Motor Company used this data along with other statistical studies to determine the cost benefit of improving the safety of the Ford Pinto compared to the cost of loss of life.
Ford demonstrated to society what is not acceptable culturally or legally. The Ford Motor Company had decided not to change the fuel tanks design location in order to reduce the production costs. Ethical business decisions require consideration of two important factors, benefit and harm. The gas filler pipe was poorly designed in that it would have a high chance of being disconnected from the fuel tank in case a collision occurred and this led to spillage of fuel resulting into fire Birsch, Looking at this case today, it is understandable why this case is being looked at differently.
This left the jury with the decision to determine if Ford Motors should be held accountable for the deaths of passengers of the Ford Pinto. Had the consumer been correctly informed, they would become responsible for any results stemming from the decision to purchase the vehicle, regardless of whether the cost savings had been passed on to them or not.
The engineers are therefore more like passive actors, versus the more active decision makers in corporate headquarters. The question remains regarding whether or not Ford put a price on human lives, or if the company was not at fault for simply trying to compete with foreign car companies to put an American made fuel efficient vehicle on the road.
Shareholders probably looked at the consequences of the decisions of the Ford management. What is the cost of a life?Sample of The Ford Pinto Case Essay (you can also order custom written The Ford Pinto Case essay) Gioia did not hasten the decision to recall the vehicles simply because the scripts did not provide ethical dimensions.
made him act out of his own conviction and had to ignore his inner decisions to recall the Pinto and instead complied. The main controversy surrounding the Ford Pinto case was The Ford Motor Company's choices made during development to compromise safety for efficiency and profit maximization.
More specifically, it was Ford's decision to use the cost/benefit analysis detailed in section 11 to make production decisions that translated into lost lives.
Ford Pinto Case John Fraughton Jr. Taylor Gray Brenda Greenwell Christopher Macintyre Leanne Marks University of Phoenix MGT March 17, Table of Contents Introduction 3 Recommended Solutions and Supporting Information to the Ford Pinto Case 3 Traffic Safety and Accident Data 4 Ethical Opinion 5 Influences from External.
Case Analysis: Pinto Fires Introduction Greed is the root to evil or at least the motivation behind some corporations making a good, ethical decision.
You must be aware of these biases and incentives and carefully consider the ethical implications of every decision. The decades since the. Essay, Case Study, Textbook Solution. The Ethical Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case On August 10, three young girls died in a Ford Pinto after being stuck from the rear by a driv.
Ethical business decisions require .Download